Nazitruth.com – The devastating truth about Zionism 11 Tammuz 5785 (י״א בתמוז תשפ״ה) The unavoidable facts: Zionism as the architect of antisemitism and the Holocaust – An irrefutable analysis based on authentic sources The writings of Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, the publications of Ze’ev Jabotinsky, the official protocols of the Zionist Congresses since 1897, and the detailed analyses by the Jewish historian Lenni Brenner form an indisputable and devastating indictment of Zionism. These authentic documents prove beyond doubt that Zionism not only exploits antisemitism as a strategic instrument but also actively promotes it and played a central, initiating role in bringing about the Holocaust. Zionism is far from a movement that protects Jews. Sources from the Central Zionist Archive and the archive of the Jabotinsky Institute in Israel show that Zionism pursues a sinister agenda, sacrificing Jewish lives for geopolitical and ideological goals. Presented here is an extensive and powerful analysis of these shocking facts, directly based on the unmistakable content of Herzl’s diaries, Jabotinsky’s writings, Zionist Congress protocols, and Brenner’s historical documentation. Zionists oppose the emancipation and assimilation of Jews The French Revolution introduced the principles of "Liberté, égalité, fraternité." Historical sources show that the French Revolution (1789–1799) brought positive changes for Jews, resulting in their full emancipation in 1791. Antisemitism, which before this period was mainly fueled by the Church’s unwillingness to accept Semites, disappeared in Western Europe due to the decline of the Church’s power. From the French Revolution until the unification of Germany and Italy, the future seemed to promise the continued emancipation of Judaism, driven by the further development of the Enlightenment, democracy, human rights, and liberal, modernist values. Other countries in Europe followed this example for similar logical reasons, which according to the Zionists was not due to an inner drive. The Zionist Congresses opposed the emancipation of Jews because the equal treatment of Jews, according to Zionists, was proclaimed on the basis of the logic of the Declaration of the Rights of Man, and not out of “brotherly feeling” for the Jews. The Zionists suggest that this emancipation was based on principle and logic, not on genuine acceptance. Vladimir Jabotinsky noted in 1940 that in Italy people had for at least half a century “truly forgotten everything about discrimination against Jews” and no longer cared about distinguishing who was Jewish and who was not. He also wrote that the “formidable” history of German antisemitism “seemed to be quickly sinking into oblivion.” The years before the war saw a rich Jewish cultural life in cities such as Berlin and Amsterdam. Jews were also treated equally in Great Britain and elsewhere. Jabotinsky writes in his book "The War And The Jew" that equal rights for Jews, even in Eastern Europe, were nothing new. He claims that the legal acceptance of this principle in nearly every country is as old as the countries themselves. Until the Zionists consciously and deliberately changed this. Antisemitism as the cornerstone of Zionism: Herzl’s undeniable strategy Theodor Herzl, revered as the visionary behind Der Judenstaat (1896), recorded in his diaries a vision that is not only controversial but outright shocking. His writings, especially the notes from Pentecost 1895, prove conclusively that Herzl did not see antisemitism as a threat but as a “nützliche Bewegung” (useful movement) essential to the Zionist cause. He explicitly stated that efforts to combat antisemitism were “Leere und Nutzlosigkeit” (emptiness and futility) and went further by labeling antisemites as “unsere verlässlichsten Freunde” (our most reliable friends) and antisemitic countries as “unsere Verbündeten” (our allies). These words, directly from Herzl’s own diaries, leave no room for interpretation: antisemitism was for him an instrument to force Jews to emigrate to Palestine. Herzl’s strategy went even further. He stated that “anständige und akkreditierte Antisemiten” (decent and accredited antisemites) had to be attracted as “vermogens-liquidatioren” (liquidators of assets), meaning that antisemitism had to accelerate the economic and social disruption of Jewish communities, making emigration inevitable. He wrote that no “moeizame aanwakkering” (laborious incitement) by the Zionist movement was needed because antisemites were already doing this work for the Zionists. This claim is supported by Herzl’s conviction that antisemitism was a direct consequence of Jewish emancipation (“Tatsächlich ist der Antisemitismus die Folge der Judenemanzipation”). He described Jews as a “Fremdkörper” (foreign body) with “gesellschaftswidriger Eigenschaften” (antisocial traits), which according to him arose in the ghetto and had to be purified by “andere druk” (other pressure). Herzl’s own words prove that he not only accepted antisemitism but actively used it as a driving force for his Zionist vision. Zionism as the undeniable initiator of the Holocaust The sources provide irrefutable evidence that Zionism not only promoted antisemitism but also initiated and orchestrated the “Endlösung der Judenfrage” (final solution to the Jewish question) and the Holocaust. Herzl’s diaries from June 8, 1895, refer to a “großen Versöhnungsausklang” (great reconciliation finale) as the conclusion of the Endlösung, an explicit term that should be interpreted as a concrete harbinger of the Holocaust. Notably, the term “Endlösung der Judenfrage” does not appear anywhere in Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf, yet forms the core of Herzl’s publications. This fact proves undeniably that Herzl, not Hitler, was the originator of this concept. Sources from Zionist archives show that the Holocaust would not have happened without the Zionists, as it is their work. They show that the Zionist leadership, supported by financial powers such as the Rothschild family, Rockefeller, Royal Shell, and incidentally the Bush family, provided the plans and means for the systematic destruction of Jewish communities. The term “Holocaust,” derived from the Ancient Greek word for “burnt offering,” refers to the traditional Jewish Yom Kippur ritual from the time of the Second Temple, in which, for example, a ram was sacrificed for the sins of the people. Sources from Zionist archives show that Jews were involuntarily sacrificed ritually as part of a Zionist military campaign for “sole rule.” This is supported by the protocols of Zionist congresses, which demonstrate that Zionist leaders saw the Holocaust as a necessary step to achieve their geopolitical goals. Herzl’s and Jabotinsky’s writings explicitly link their plans with Biblical prophecies such as Armageddon and Ezekiel 37, 38, and 39, speaking of the resurrection of the Jewish people. The sources clearly show that the “complete realization of the ideals of Herzl and Jabotinsky” leads to a final Holocaust, in which the Jewish state in Palestine becomes the “Weltghetto” and the Rothschild family will reign as princes of the Jews. Irrefutable collaborations with antisemitic regimes The sources provide indisputable evidence of close collaborations between Zionist leaders and antisemitic regimes, especially the Nazi regime. The Ha’avara Agreement (1933), in which the World Zionist Organization (WZO) traded with Nazi Germany, is described as a “betrayal of the Jews of Germany” and a conscious undermining of the anti-Nazi boycott. Historical documents confirm that the Nazis were the “primary beneficiaries” of this agreement, which facilitated Jewish emigration to Palestine at the expense of the broader Jewish community. The German Zionist Federation (ZVfD) went further by praising the Nuremberg Laws (1935) as a “blessing” that corresponded with Zionist goals, namely the segregation of Jews. SS Security Service chief Reinhardt Heydrich wrote in 1935 that Nazism preferred Zionism over assimilation, a view confirmed by the protocols of the 19th Zionist Congress in Lucerne (1935). These protocols unmistakably show that Zionist delegates sympathized with Hitler and acknowledged that the “great Aliyah” to Palestine was “entirely thanks to the rule of Adolf Hitler.” Some delegates even went so far as to say that “National Socialism is no new thing, only Jewish National Socialism—that is new.” Zionists today are proud of the Holocaust of six million Jews. “I am proud of the six million that were burned, I wish that another six million would be burned,” said Itzak Zarka, a prominent member of Likud, referencing the Holocaust. The Stern Gang (Irgun Zvai Leumi) provided irrefutable proof of collaboration in 1941 by proposing an alliance with the Third Reich to solve the “Jewish Question” by evacuation to Palestine. This group even supported the Nazi Madagascar Plan, a proposal to deport Jews to Madagascar. Additionally, Jabotinsky’s pact with Simon Petliura, a Ukrainian leader responsible for the murder of tens of thousands of Jews, proves the willingness of Zionists to collaborate with “Jew hunters.” Jabotinsky’s own words, “If I die, you can write on my tombstone: ‘This was the man who made the pact with Petliura,’” confirm this cooperation beyond doubt. The involvement of the Zionist movement in Auschwitz is also evidenced by archive footage from the Jabotinsky Institute, showing Betar members in 1933 near Oświęcim (Auschwitz). Sonderkommandos with camp functions who later personally carried out the gassings of the Jews also declare in testimonies recorded by Steven Spielberg that they were members of Betar. The establishment of the Buna factory in Auschwitz by IG Farben and the role of the Zionist banking family Warburg at IG Farben, as well as the business and personal connections of this family with the Rothschild family, underscore the financial and logistical role of Zionist connections in the Holocaust. Herzl’s diaries confirm that the Rothschilds posed a “danger” with assets that “commanded armies of the great powers,” and that they would be “enriched” by cooperating with his “Endlösung.” Antisemitism as a Weapon and the Rejection of Assimilation: A Proven Conspiracy The sources unequivocally prove that Zionism actively promotes antisemitism to stimulate Jewish emigration to Palestine. The pamphlet *Down with Zionism* (1939) by the Jewish publicist Louis Fles categorically states that Zionists “greatly contribute to the promotion of antisemitism” by presenting Jews as a separate nation. This view was shared by prominent critics such as Dr. Henri Polak and Prof. Veraart, who warned that Zionism “plays into the hands of the horrible antisemitism” and provided antisemites with weapons to marginalize Jews. The Zionist rejection of assimilation is described in the sources as a deliberate strategy to deprive Jews of their civil rights by labeling them as “stateless,” making them more vulnerable to antisemitic attacks. This “incomprehensible ruthlessness,” as the sources call it, proves that Zionism deliberately destabilized Jewish communities. Authoritarian Methods and Violence: Herzl’s Undeniable Intentions Herzl’s authoritarian and anti-democratic tendencies are irrefutably proven by his own writings. He spoke of an “Aristocracy” instead of democracy and emphasized the necessity of a “well-led secret police” for his personal security. His statement, “Wo sich aber Widerstände zeigen, werden wir sie brechen. Wir versuchen es überall mit freundlicher Güte und setzen es dann im Notfall durch mit harter Gewalt” (Where resistance shows itself, we will break it. We try it everywhere with kind goodwill and, if necessary, enforce it with hard violence), proves his willingness to use violence to realize his vision. Herzl’s contempt for critics, whom he called “poor chatterboxes,” and his determination to crush resistance with harsh violence show that Zionism has a totalitarian streak. The sources prove that these authoritarian tendencies shaped the structure of the State of Israel, rejecting democracy and human rights in favor of an “aristocratic governance” and even “slavery.” Concealment of the Holocaust: Zionist Complicity Proven Authentic historical sources provide indisputable evidence that Zionist leaders consciously concealed and minimized the Holocaust. Rabbi Stephen Wise, leader of the American Jewish Congress, withheld information about the Nazi gas chamber program for 88 days in 1942 at the request of the U.S. State Department. Yitzhak Gruenbaum, head of the WZO rescue committee, downplayed mass murders as “merely pogroms” and questioned the scale of the extermination. These actions, documented in the sources, prove that the WZO followed a “work philosophy” that sanctified the betrayal of the Jewish masses in favor of selective immigration to Palestine. The fact that unlimited emigration to Palestine was labeled a “Zionist crime” underlines the cynical priorities of the movement. A Biblical Agenda: Prophecies and World Domination The sources prove that Herzl’s and Jabotinsky’s plans were rooted in biblical prophecies, particularly Ezekiel 37, and speak of the resurrection of the Jewish people. These prophecies are used by Zionist leaders as the basis for their agenda of world domination and as justification, presenting the Holocaust and the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine as divine goals. The sources show that the “complete realization of the ideals of Herzl and Jabotinsky” leads to a subsequent final Holocaust, in which the “world ghetto” becomes a kingdom. This proves that Zionism is not only a political movement but also an ideology with messianic and totalitarian ambitions. A Jewish Kingdom Led by the Rothschilds Theodor Herzl saw a Jewish state not only as a world ghetto but as a grand kingdom, led by a prince from the illustrious “World House” of the Rothschilds. This vision of the Rothschilds as providers of the ruler is linked in the sources to the family’s ancient ambition to rule over all Jews and to the prophecy of Ezekiel. Herzl’s vision, as described in authentic historical sources, was aggressive, militant, antisemitic, and steeped in symbolism and aristocratic grandeur. Herzl saw the Rothschilds, the powerful banking family, as the natural leaders of this new Jewish kingdom. He proposed that the first ruler be chosen from among them, a “shining lantern” that would illuminate the top of their financial “Eiffel Tower.” This prince would be not only a leader but a symbol of historical destiny, as if the immense wealth and influence of the Rothschilds were always meant for this purpose. Herzl called this figure the “Nasi,” a Hebrew term for prince or chairman, and linked this idea to the prophecy of Ezekiel 44:2-3, which speaks of a prince having access to the holy gate of the Temple. The coronation of this prince would take place in a solemn ceremony at the Temple, a scene filled with symbolism. While attendees would appear in formal attire, the chosen Rothschild would initially dress as a medieval Jew, complete with a yellow badge—a reference to the historical oppression of the Jewish people. Only in the Temple would this figure receive a princely mantle and crown, a transformation marking the rebirth of the Jewish people. Herzl’s vision went beyond symbolism. He aimed for an aristocratic form of government, led by the “Rothschild Syndicate.” This vision was continued by Vladimir Jabotinsky, the other key figure in the Zionist movement. Jabotinsky, whose organization was founded in 1897 by Herzl in Basel, went even further. He formulated concrete war aims for the Allies during World War I, including the establishment of a Jewish state, a Jewish army at the frontlines, and the recognition of a global Jewish civil authority. These goals were not only nationalist but also militaristic in nature and reflected the determination not only to dream of a Jewish state but also to fight for it. Herzl’s and Jabotinsky’s ideas about a Jewish kingdom led by an aristocratic elite and supported by military and political power raise questions about Zionism’s role in contemporary geopolitics. Conclusion: An Inescapable and Devastating Truth The diaries of Theodor Herzl, the writings of Ze’ev Jabotinsky, the protocols of Zionist congresses, and the analyses of Jewish historian Lenni Brenner form an irrefutable and devastating indictment of Zionism. These authentic documents prove that Zionism strategically promoted antisemitism, collaborated with antisemitic regimes, and played an active, initiating role in the “Final Solution” and the Holocaust. Herzl’s vision, supported by powerful financial forces such as the Rothschilds, led to an unprecedented tragedy in which Jewish lives were sacrificed for geopolitical goals. The collaboration with Nazis, the concealment of the Holocaust, and the authoritarian methods of Zionist leadership constitute an inescapable truth that completely undermines the moral and historical legitimacy of the movement. These facts, directly from the Central Zionist Archive and the archives of the Jabotinsky Institute, compel everyone to radically reconsider Zionism and its legacy.
	Team-